Originally posted in a LVRJ Forum
the spending they deemed necessary is substantially more than Gibbons' $6.2 billion in recommended spending. .. Horsford .. estimated it at "just south of $7 billion."
The problem is not Fibbons/Horsefurd's $800M spending disagreement, it's the $6.2B they AGREE about. The parties keep very tight control over the debate: "Should our government be HUGE or GIGANTIC?" Nowhere in this session can you find discussion about "How *small* can we make goverernment?"
I can answer that question. $100M per year. Less than projected room tax revenue. That's right. Of course, we can't get there so long as the Republicrats are controlled by the education unions and all the other leeches who receive direct financial benefit from the system.
No comments:
Post a Comment