Originally published in a LVRJ Forum.
It's the LEGISLATURE's job to define "involuntary servitude", not the Courts. Who needs to rely on the opinions of legal professionals, anyway? The Constitution is written in simple English. Involuntary Servitude is obviously making someone do something against their will. Probably >70% of NV kids are in public school INVOLUNTARILY. The issue turns on exactly *what* they are doing.
Most of them are providing warm bodies for the Districts to get government funding, ie "idle" work. If idleness is profitable, I'm sure the kids would rather be doing it someplace else for their OWN benefit. At GVHS students have to walk (or equivalent) "to raise money for science classes", ie "active" work.
Better re-read the Constitution. Article 11 §2 says "the legislature may pass such laws as will tend to secure a general attendance .." In other words, *optional* is the DEFAULT unless the legislature enacts compulsary attendance, which to the delight of educrats and your dopey coalition, it did.
No comments:
Post a Comment